What games do you have?

Skylanders doesn't count.
I happen to only have Orange.

I always wanted to try a classic game but haven't seen one around in a few years.

I myself saw one at Gamestop recently for the 360, but it was expensive, so I didn't buy it.

Eh, I don't do Xbox or PS. I think I saw Purple or Orange not to long ago but I didn't care at the time.

Yeah, I'm not a fan of them either, but have a 360. I despise Sony though, and will never buy any products.

weebbby wrote:

Yeah, I'm not a fan of them either, but have a 360. I despise Sony though, and will never buy any products.

Honestly the only thing they have that Microsoft doesn't is good exclusives, but I think Nintendo wins that department.
(Totally not a hidden quote button test)

Honestly, I think that Sony has the worst exclusives ever, and even Microsoft is better in that respect.
But yes, Nintendo is by far the superior video game company. At least in my preferences.

I want it. Seems amazing.

X-Tremey wrote:

I want it. Seems amazing.

Does 'it' in this case refer to Orange? Or what does it refer to?

Any spyro game i can get my hands on.

Ah. I want some of the other ones too, but as said, I won't pay that much for one, especially a used copy.

So from what I've heard the first three are the ones to have?

^ i believe so. Skylanders is fun, but too expensive.

^Ya. One of the main draws was the "magic", but the concept is getting old and the series is straying too far from what it's best at.

scratchking22 wrote:

^Ya. One of the main draws was the "magic", but the concept is getting old and the series is straying too far from what it's best at.

And before i thought $7.49 was expensive for one toy hack when SSA came out. >.> I AINT PAYIN 15 BUCKS FOR A FIGURE. Ah well. It was fun while it lasted.:/

X-Tremey wrote:

scratchking22 wrote:

^Ya. One of the main draws was the "magic", but the concept is getting old and the series is straying too far from what it's best at.

And before i thought $7.49 was expensive for one toy hack when SSA came out. >.> I AINT PAYIN 15 BUCKS FOR A FIGURE. Ah well. It was fun while it lasted.:/

Exactly. Those were the good old days...but Activision is a greedy pig.

X-Tremey wrote:

scratchking22 wrote:

^Ya. One of the main draws was the "magic", but the concept is getting old and the series is straying too far from what it's best at.

And before i thought $7.49 was expensive for one toy hack when SSA came out. >.> I AINT PAYIN 15 BUCKS FOR A FIGURE. Ah well. It was fun while it lasted.:/

Exactly. Those were the good old days...but Activision is a greedy pig.

scratchking22 wrote:

X-Tremey wrote:

scratchking22 wrote:

^Ya. One of the main draws was the "magic", but the concept is getting old and the series is straying too far from what it's best at.

And before i thought $7.49 was expensive for one toy hack when SSA came out. >.> I AINT PAYIN 15 BUCKS FOR A FIGURE. Ah well. It was fun while it lasted.:/

Exactly. Those were the good old days...but Activision is a greedy pig.

Well, back then, The stores got to pick the prices at which they sold their skylanders. For S:G activision made there be a minimum list price, which was $9.99.

Anyway, was the second series any good? I believe it was called the "Legends" series or somthing?

No idea, havent tried. It was made from someone different then the originals.

I have Dawn of the Dragon for the Wii.

Is it fun?

Sure! We just...haven't...beaten it yet... DX

I really want to try a classic game.

I've recently felt like I need to try new Spyro games. Skylanders got me interested in Spyro, but I'm not as big a fan of Skylanders since Swap Force. So I've been looking up the Legend series. I think it's a really brilliant storyline. And now I'm...sorta obsessed with the characters. Especially Malefor. Dunno why. DX